AZ Republican Tweets ‘Jail Time’ In Response To Allegations Of Voter Irregularities in Georgia

OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion

Arizona Republican State Sen. Wendy Rogers made some noise this week when discussing calls for an audit of the 2020 election results in the battleground state of Georgia.

The audit in Maricopa County, Arizona, is nearing completion and if there are conclusive results of mass fraud and irregularities, it could pave the way for other states to follow suit.

Arizona GOP Chairwoman Dr. Kelli Ward recently revealed that a whopping nine state delegations toured the Maricopa County audit facility.

Ward, who threatened that there “could be arrests of people who are refusing to comply,” says the audit could be completed much sooner than expected.

And many think Georgia could be the next state to launch a full audit.

Rogers’ tweet was part of a response to a few threads on Twitter.

She was responding to a tweet from former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik.

“In Fulton County, 50,000 inactive voters were activated by a democratic operative. 174 batches we’re missing = 17,400 ballots. Just those alone, 67,400, and there’s much more to come. @GovKemp @GaSecofStateknew they were certifying a false election,” he tweeted.

Kerik was responding to a tweet from Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who also spoke about the election results in Georgia.

“Joe Biden only won Georgia by 11,779 votes, but the Fulton Co audit should overturn the election to Trump. I will say it over and over again, Georgia re-elected President Trump. The error rate alone should throw the election. I will be actively supporting the audit,” Greene tweeted.

Earlier this week, Pennsylvania Republican state Sen Doug Mastriano announced that he will launch a “forensic investigation of the 2020 General Election and 2021 Primary.”

In his announcement, Mastriano detailed his decision and why it is so important.

A forensic investigation of our election results and processes for the 2020 General Election and the 2021 Primary will go a long way to restore trust in our system. Voting is the fundamental right of all citizens. We should continually look for ways to improve the voting process to ensure every voice is heard.

Today, as Chair of the Intergovernmental Operations Committee, I issued letters to several counties requesting information and materials needed to conduct a forensic investigation of the 2020 General Election and the 2021 Primary.

We have asked these counties to respond by July 31st with a plan to comply. The counties represent different geographical regions of Pennsylvania and differing political makeups. Some are Republican while others are Democrat, which means that this will be a balanced investigation.

Mastriano also detailed how he believes top officials in Pennsylvania may have skirted the rules or done things unethically in the election:

Additionally, in the weeks leading up to the election, the Department of State repeatedly altered the manner in which Pennsylvania’s election was conducted. Those who voted in person were held to a higher standard than those who mailed in their ballots. Signatures required for mail-in ballots were rendered meaningless as the PA Supreme Court ruled that ballots could not be rejected based on an analysis of the voter’s signature.

On September 17th, the PA Supreme Court ruled that counties had to count ballots received up to three days after Election Day. A week before the election, the Department of State told the U.S. Supreme Court that ballots received after 8 p.m. on November 3rd would be segregated. But the department changed the rules two days before the election and directed counties to canvass those ballots upon receipt. The U.S. Supreme Court had to step in and order the counties to segregate the ballots.

Just hours before the polls opened on November 3, the department changed the rules again by providing late guidance on how to help voters whose mail-in or absentee ballots were incorrectly completed. The “guidance” resulted in inconsistent application across the Commonwealth. Some counties contacted voters as directed while others did not. There was no basis for that guidance in current or case law.

“A full forensic investigation is critically necessary for our Commonwealth for the sake of transparency and accountability. There is nothing to fear if there is nothing to hide. Those who have concerns about the integrity of the 2020 and 2021 elections will have those concerns investigated and hopefully addressed. Those who think that there was zero voter fraud, no irregularities, and that the elections were conducted perfectly will have the chance to be vindicated,” he added.

Back to top button