The courtroom reckoning came years after a lucrative agreement placed Washington connections and foreign influence under a harsh spotlight.
Former GOP congressman David Rivera received 10 years in federal prison Friday for secretly lobbying on Venezuela’s behalf.
The sentence was severe because the judge hearing the case rejected an explanation that framed the controversy as simply a missing form.
A jury convicted the Florida Republican in May on all counts, including failing to register as a foreign agent.
The verdict also covered conspiracy to commit money laundering connected to work for Nicolás Maduro’s Venezuelan government.
Rivera, 61, had remained jailed since the conviction, and his lawyers say they plan to appeal.
The case centers on a three-month, $50 million contract involving an American affiliate of Venezuela’s state-owned oil company.
Prosecutors said Rivera used that arrangement to pursue relief from American pressure on Maduro during President Trump’s first administration.
That put a former lawmaker’s Washington relationships at the center of a national security and transparency case.
Rivera served in Congress from 2011 to 2013 after building a political career in Florida’s Cuban American community.
His reputation as an anti-communist made the undisclosed work especially striking to prosecutors and, ultimately, the sentencing judge.
US District Judge Melissa Damian said there was no dispute that the money came from Maduro’s government.
“Nobody would accept that’s ok and I don’t think this is different,” Damian said of the arrangement.
Prosecutors argued that the American public and government were the victims of a concealed foreign influence operation.
“The United States and the public were the true victims of this fraud,” Assistant US Attorney Roger Cruz said.
Cruz accused Rivera of repeatedly betraying the trust he built during his years in public office.
According to prosecutors, then Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delcy Rodríguez enlisted Rivera to use Republican contacts against US sanctions.
They said Rivera and political consultant Esther Nuhfer approached influential figures while keeping the Venezuelan connection hidden.
Among those contacts were Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Rivera’s longtime friend, and Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas.
Witnesses, including Rubio and Sessions, testified they felt betrayed after learning about the massive consulting contract.
Their testimony underscored the danger of undisclosed foreign payments when former officials seek access to decision-makers.
Prosecutors said Rivera and Nuhfer feared disclosure would damage his standing as an anti-communist political figure.
They also described an encrypted chat with Venezuelan media executive Raúl Gorrín, Rivera’s alleged conduit to Maduro’s government.
Jurors saw messages using nicknames for Maduro, Rodríguez, Sessions and Rubio, according to the trial account.
Prosecutors further alleged the partners backdated records and devised sham agreements to conceal payments and their work.
One disputed transaction involved $3.75 million wired to a Florida company that maintained Gorrín’s yacht.
Damian called it “a classic money laundering case” while rejecting Rivera’s request to reduce his sentencing guidelines range.
The defense maintained the $50 million agreement concerned attracting ExxonMobil back to Venezuela, a commercial undertaking.
Rivera’s lawyers argued that commercial work generally falls outside the foreign-agent registration law.
They said his meetings with American officials separately sought a post-Maduro government friendlier to the United States.
“There’s not one word in any chat” helping Maduro, attorney Ed Shohat argued.
Shohat argued Rivera should not die in prison over failing to submit a foreign-agent registration form.
The political outreach included arranging meetings for Rodríguez across several cities and bringing Sessions into the effort.
Sessions later sought an ExxonMobil meeting for Rodríguez and carried a letter from Maduro to Trump, according to testimony.
Trump ultimately sanctioned Maduro and pursued a maximum-pressure policy rather than the easing prosecutors said Rivera sought.
That outcome does not erase the disclosure obligations or money laundering findings at the heart of Rivera’s conviction, The Hill reported.
Rivera’s attorneys applied for a presidential pardon in June and say they intend to challenge the verdict on appeal.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
