Advertisement

‘I Was Promised a Smoking Gun!’ Watters Snaps On Lefty Co-Host Over Biden Check

Advertisement

OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.


A segment of “The Five” got heated again last week after co-hosts Jesse Watters and the panel’s lone liberal, Jessica Tarlov, squared off after she claimed a $200,000 check written to Joe by his brother Jim Biden on March 1, 2018, was not a “smoking gun” linking him to international business dealings.

The co-hosts played a clip of newly elected House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) saying that Republicans believe the father of Hunter Biden and other relatives were all involved in unsavory and potentially illicit business dealings, adding that the GOP-led House could subpoena Hunter very soon to testify about their claims.

“Jessica and her ilk for years have said, ‘Well, you don’t have money going directly into Joe Biden’s bank account.’ All right, so now we have a check for $200,000 from one company through the brother to Joe’s bank account,” Watters said to begin the segment.

“Ok, you still say that that’s not from overseas. That was a loan. Ok, OK. What happens if the next check originates somewhere really bad, Jessica? And I mean really bad?” he continued.

“And it goes through Hunter or James, and it goes directly into Joe Biden’s checking account? Is that your smoking gun? Is that your smoking gun, Jessica? Because, as you said, that was a smoking gun if money went from overseas directly into Joe Biden’s bank account. If a check comes out at some point from that avenue, is that a smoking gun?” Watters asked as the segment already began to get heated.

“Ok, so two things —” Tarlov began before Watters immediately shot back, “Yes or no?”

“No,” Tarlov said.

Advertisement

“It’s not? Woah, woah, woah. Jessica! For a year, you said, ‘The money never hit his bank account.’ What if I have a check that hits his bank account that comes from overseas? Is that not a smoking gun?” Watters demanded to know.

Tarlov then attempted to respond, but Watters cut her off as he continued to explode.

“Someone help me out,” she pleaded with her co-hosts as Watters continued interrupting. “Ok, if, uh, uh, uh, Ok —”

Tarlov finally got the chance to explain that the check the panel had been discussing was dated 2018, before Biden was president.

“Is he in elected office, and did he do something about it? So, that check, that 2018 check, was when he was not doing anything except hanging around, and there was an explanation for it. So if you get a check, then you can connect that to an action that he took,” Tarlov said.

“Oh, no, not to an action that he took! That was just an action that he took. Because before you said none of the money from overseas went into his checking account—” Watters began before Tarlov jumped in and said, “That’s not true!”

“So now it’s an action?” Watters demanded.

Advertisement

“You are yelling, and there’s no reason for it,” Tarlov complained.

“There’s a reason,” Watters continued. “I was promised a smoking gun, and if I deliver a smoking gun, you have to admit that gun was smoking.”

WATCH:

Advertisement

Meanwhile, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) essentially put Biden and members of his family on notice this week about what they can expect to see from him and other GOP leaders very soon.

In an interview with Newsmax TV host Eric Bolling, the Kentucky Republican said that the Biden family could soon expect to see some subpoenas requesting information regarding alleged influence-peddling schemes that extend back more than a decade.

Comer told Bolling that overall, Americans who want to see the Bidens held to account are “going to be very satisfied with the next step.”

“We built a case that will win in court, and we’ve made it all the way to the personal bank records of the Bidens,” Comer said.

“So now that we can trace the money, we have enough bank records that we can bring the Bidens in,” Comer said. “So we’re preparing everything now to be able to serve them and try to bring them in. We’ve got a couple more bank statements that need to come in first, but when that all comes in, it should be in a matter of days.”

Advertisement
Test your skills with this Quiz!