House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) expressed his support for postponing House elections in Louisiana after the Supreme Court overturned the state’s congressional map a day earlier.
GOP Governor Jeff Landry announced that Louisiana would not be able to conduct elections under the current district map and emphasized that efforts would be made to create a new plan. Any revised map is likely to endanger the seats of Democratic Representatives Troy Carter and Cleo Fields, both of whom are black.
“The governor has no choice but to suspend it,” Johnson told reporters. “The court has ruled our map unconstitutional.”
The recent Supreme Court ruling curtailed the Voting Rights Act’s reach, affecting the long-standing requirement that map drawers protect the voting power of racial minorities. The high court ruled that congressional maps drawn to favor one race over another violate the Constitution’s equal protection clauses.
The exact timing of the rescheduled elections is “not my decision,” Johnson added, but said “the way it was typically done” was to hold an all-party “jungle” primary in November, with a runoff in December, and “it looks like it may be that way again.”
“But again, my fingerprints aren’t on it,” Johnson added, per Politico. “It’s a decision of the state Legislature.”
He also urged other states with VRA-mandated minority districts to act swiftly and consider redrawing their maps before November, even though many have already started their election processes.
“All states that have unconstitutional maps should look at that very carefully, and I think they should do it before the midterms,” he said.
It’s not clear whether states that are already holding elections based on maps that have now been ruled unconstitutional will be able to certify results, as they are likely to be challenged in court.
Meanwhile, new population projections suggest Democrats could face a growing structural disadvantage in presidential elections after the 2030 Census, as demographic shifts continue to favor faster-growing states that tend to lean Republican.
Estimates indicate that several large Democratic-leaning states may lose Electoral College votes, while a handful of Republican-leaning states are expected to gain representation in Congress.
Under current projections, states like Texas and Florida are expected to see the largest gains. Texas could add as many as three Electoral College votes, while Florida may gain two. Smaller but still notable increases are projected for states like Idaho and Utah, each potentially gaining one additional vote.
At the same time, several traditionally Democratic strongholds could lose ground. California is projected to lose up to three Electoral College votes, while Illinois could lose two. New York and Rhode Island are also expected to lose one vote each.
Each state’s Electoral College total equals its number of House seats plus two senators, meaning population gains or losses can shift presidential math over time.
According to an analysis cited in recent reporting, population growth in southern and western states is outpacing that of large coastal states, creating a long-term challenge for Democrats in national elections.
The Democrat Party is facing an apocalyptic electoral future.
Americans are fleeing blue states, their voter base is being deported, and race-based redistricting has been struck down.
After the 2030 census, it is possible that Republicans will have an electoral advantage that… pic.twitter.com/hGHWUui0aZ
— Theo Wold (@RealTheoWold) May 1, 2026
Several factors are driving these migration patterns. Lower housing costs, job opportunities, and tax environments in states like Texas and Florida have attracted residents from higher-cost areas such as California and New York.
At the same time, some regions in the Northeast and Midwest have experienced slower growth or even population declines.
These trends have already begun to reshape the Electoral College map. After the 2020 Census, states like Texas and Florida gained seats, while California lost a congressional seat for the first time in its history.
If current projections hold through the end of the decade, the impact could be even more significant in the 2032 presidential election and beyond, election analysts have predicted.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
