White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre went ballistic after several reporters asked her about House Republicans moving forward with an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
The briefing heated up when CNN White House correspondent Kevin Liptak asked Jean-Pierre: “The House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, is talking more about starting an impeachment investigation into the President. What’s your response to that? And if he did that, would that make any kind of cooperation with the House impossible going forward?”
KJP responded: “Look, I’m not going to get into hypotheticals. I’m not going to get into what the House Republicans may or may not do. What I can speak to is what the President is focused on. He’s focused on real priorities that American families care about. He’s focused on the American family, but they want to focus on his family. They can do whatever it is that they wish to do, but we’re going to stay focused. We’re going to stay steadfast.”
“And there are two examples of — today — of how the President is moving forward. I just talked about the mental health — the mental health event that he — that the President just had and announcing actions to expand access to mental health care and tackle this crisis, which is, as you all know, a critical part of his Unity Agenda that he’s spoken about for the past two years and will continue to do so. And let’s not forget, earlier today, Emmett Till and what we were able to do, what the President was able to do, to make sure that there’s a monument that continues — a monument for Emmett Till and his mom to continue to — to shed light on that part of our history and to tell that story so we can move forward,” she added.
KJP continued: “That’s going to be the pr- — that’s going to be the President’s focus. He wants to work in a bipartisan way. He does. We have been able to do that. We have the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. We have the CHIPS and Science Act. We have the PACT Act for veterans. We have — we have found ways — I think more than 300 pieces of legislation that the President has signed in the past two years has been bipartisan. That’s what the President wants to do. That’s how he wants to move forward. And that’s going to be our focus.”
Then, KJP snapped again when reporter Fred Lucas of the Daily Signal asked a similar question. Jean-Pierre interrupted Lucas several times, talked over him as he tried to get his question out, and dismissed him numerous times:
FRED LUCAS: And one more on the — Speaker McCarthy’s comments on impeachment inquiry. His point seems to be —
JEAN-PIERRE: Wait, say that again.
FRED LUCAS: Speaker McCarthy’s impeachment inquiry comments. He seems to be making the point that he thinks there’s been enough mounting evidence to at least have an inquiry on this.
JEAN-PIERRE: I’ve already spoken to this —
FRED LUCAS: Can — yeah, can —
JEAN-PIERRE: — twice before though.
FRED LUCAS: But can you at least say whether you agree or disagree that there’s enough mounting evidence (inaudible)?
JEAN-PIERRE: I answered two of your colleagues this — this question about what Speaker McCarthy is going to do, not — not going to do, how House Republicans are going to move forward. I just don’t have anything else to share.
Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan came up short recently in his push to become the speaker of the U.S. House. But he remains focused on what he called “one of his top priorities” — holding President Joe Biden accountable.
Jordan, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that Republicans will decide early next year whether they will begin the process of impeaching Biden.
Jordan said that the GOP’s impeachment investigation still needs some finishing touches, but many of his supporters already think there is enough evidence to impeach.
“I believe we will get the depositions and the interviews done in this calendar year and then make a decision early next year whether the actual evidence warrants going to articles of impeachment and moving to that stage of the investigation,” Jordan said.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
