House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is leading the Democrats impeachment witch hunt into President Donald Trump, and it has completely imploded in recent months.
But the Lying Little Schiff may have just got busted telling his biggest lie yet.
Last week, the liberal mainstream media leaped for joy when they believed they had the “smoking gun” evidence to finally bring down Trump.
As part of evidence they collected in the House impeachment inquiry, Schiff and Democrats had a note from Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal attorney, that mentioned a meeting with “Mr. Z.”
Without evidence, Schiff assumed that “Mr. Z” was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This, according to Schiff, was more proof Trump “broke the law” and “must be impeached.”
However, new documents show that Schiff now has egg on his face — “Mr. Z” is not the president of Ukraine.
Here’s the scoop from Politico:
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.
The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.”
The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.
But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.”
That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.
Soon after the Politico report scorched across social media, Trump jumped on Twitter to expose the Democrats for spreading another major lie.
Big story. Hope Fake News covers it! https://t.co/NCtUYK6Eco
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2020
Several recent revelations make it clear that Schiff has a lot of explaining to do on multiple fronts.
We recently learned the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, has a “bro-like” relationship with one of Schiff’s top aides.
Ciaramella is widely believed to be the CIA official who filed a complaint in August regarding Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky back in July.
Schiff is a fact witness because his staff met with the whistleblower before he filed the complaint in August.
When reports surfaced that his team met with the whistleblower and encouraged him to file the complaint against Trump weeks before he even did it, Schiff then lied about it and tried downplaying the significance of it.
Adding even more hilarity to it all, we’ve also learned some very troubling information about the alleged whistleblower.
Ciaramella, the rumored whistleblower, is: (1) a registered Democrat; (2) worked for Obama and Joe Biden when they were in the White House; (3) is a vocal critic of Trump; (4) helped initiate the Russia “collusion” hoax; and (5) was fired from the National Security Council in 2017 for leaks, and returned to the CIA.
Ciaramella, like Schiff, is nothing more than an anti-Trump hack trying to remove the duly elected president.
Before that, Schiff and Democrats got caught intentionally omitting key evidence in transcripts that was favorable to Trump and exonerated him from “quid pro quo” allegations.