Supreme Court Tosses Republican 2020 Election Challenge

Written by Martin Walsh

OPINION: This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion




The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday that it won’t take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.

The case was brought by a former Republican congressional candidate, Jim Bognet, and four individual voters who argued the state high court exceeded its authority when it ordered the expansion of ballot deadlines amidst the pandemic.

The ruling was unsigned, meaning it was rejected in whole rather than with a vote among all of the Justices.

The perplexing ruling comes as Democrats are actively trying to pack the Court.

Democratic officials within the U.S. House and the Senate are reportedly preparing legislation to pack the Supreme Court with four new justices.

Ironically enough, that is the exact number required to reset the current Republican majority on the bench, which currently stands at 6-3.

So if Democrats can add 4 more Justices, they would hypothetically have a 7-6 majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to The Intercept, the new legislation is set to be unveiled on Thursday and aims to bring the total number of justices on the Court to 13.

Democrat Representatives Jerry Nadler, Hank Johnson, and Mondaire Jones are championing the bill in the House, while Sen. Ed Markey is reportedly leading the push in the Senate.

Biden recently issued an executive order forming a commission that will perform a 180-day study of potential changes to the Supreme Court, including court-packing and setting term limits for justices.

“The Commission’s purpose is to provide an analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals,” the White House said in a statement.

“The topics it will examine include the genesis of the reform debate; the Court’s role in the Constitutional system; the length of service and turnover of justices on the Court; the membership and size of the Court; and the Court’s case selection, rules, and practices,” the White House added.

New York Times reported:

In his executive order, the president will create a 36-member commission charged with examining the history of the court, past changes to the process of nominating justices, and the potential consequences to altering the size of the nation’s highest court.

The panel will be led by Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel for Mr. Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a Yale Law School professor who served as deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel under Mr. Obama.

The order comes after Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer cautioned late last month that court-packing for political gain could undermine public trust in the court and its decisions.

“If the public sees judges as ‘politicians in robes,’ its confidence in the courts, and in the rule of law itself, can only diminish, diminishing the court’s power, including its power to act as a ‘check’ on the other branches,” the justice said.

Use promo code "BRIEF"
and save up to 66%

Conservative Brief benefits when you use this promo code

“The court’s decision in the 2000 presidential election case, Bush v. Gore, is often referred to as an example of its favoritism of conservative causes,” he said. “But the court did not hear or decide cases that affected the political disagreements arising out of the 2020 [Trump v. Biden] election.”

The liberal justice, who at 82 years old is the oldest judge on the court, has faced calls from progressive groups to retire while Democrats control the Senate and the confirmation process.

The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg also expressed her concerns about packing the court before her death.

“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” Justice Ginsburg said. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.”