Advertisement

Swing State Dem Warns Harris Of Trump’s ‘Special Connection’ With Voters

Advertisement

OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.


A notable Democrat in the Senate believes that his Party’s presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, needs to be concerned about the “special connection” that former President Donald Trump has with the people of Pennsylvania after the failed attempt on his life.

Sen. John Fetterman of Pennslyvania attended the 2024 Atlantic Festival on Thursday, where he spoke to The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg and issued the warning, Fox News reported.

“Trump has created a special kind of hold within the coronet he’s remade – the party – and he has a special kind of place in Pennsylvania, and I think that only deepened after the first assassination attempt,” the senator said.

“I also want people to understand, you know, and it’s not science, but there is, there’s energy and there are kinds of anger on the ground in Pennsylvania — and people are very committed and strong,” he said. “And I joked that his signs became like the state flower – and you see that everywhere.”

The polls currently suggest that the vice president has a slight lead in the state, but the former president is gaining on her.

Advertisement

But the senator said he was skeptical of the polls that show the vice president in the lead as he mentioned the seven-point lead that former Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton had in the polls in 2016.

“Everybody thought that it was in the bag, but that’s not the energy and the other kinds of things that were really consistent with what I’m witnessing all across,” he said. “And then, sadly, we saw what happened.”

“People understand who he is and what he’s about, and enough people think that that’s the feature, and it’s not a bug,” he said.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court last month reversed a lower court ruling and found that mail-in ballots with incorrect dates or without any dates on the exterior of the envelope cannot be counted, a huge win for election integrity advocates.

Advertisement

In a 4-3 decision, the state’s high court ruled on procedural grounds, stating that the lower court, which deemed the mandate unenforceable, should not have heard the case because it did not involve election boards from all 67 counties, The Associated Press reported. In Pennsylvania, counties handle the administration of elections, but the left-leaning groups that filed the case had only sued two counties—Philadelphia and Allegheny.

Two weeks ago, the Commonwealth Court had halted the enforcement of handwritten dates on exterior envelopes. The Supreme Court’s reversal of this decision now raises the possibility that thousands of ballots arriving on time could be discarded in a crucial swing state, potentially impacting the outcome of a closely contested presidential race. Many more Democrats vote by mail in the battleground state than do Republicans.

But Republican groups who appealed the decision applauded it as a big win for honesty in elections and a huge break for former President Donald Trump, who narrowly lost Pennsylvania to Joe Biden in 2020.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley, in a release, called it a major victory for election integrity “that will protect commonsense mail ballot safeguards and help voters cast their ballots with confidence.”

Attorneys representing the ten left-wing ‘community’ organizations that filed the lawsuit stated that the decision left the door open for further litigation on the issue.

Advertisement

“Thousands of voters are at risk of having their ballots rejected in November for making a meaningless mistake,” said Mimi McKenzie, legal director of the Public Interest Law Center in Philadelphia. She urged voters to “carefully read and follow the instructions for submitting a mail-in ballot to reduce the number of ballots being rejected for trivial paperwork errors.”

Two Democratic appointees joined both Republican appointees on the Supreme Court in the ruling.

The lawsuit, filed in May, challenged the enforceability of the mandate based on a state constitutional provision ensuring that all elections are “free and equal,” the AP reported.

Recent elections in Pennsylvania suggest that more than 10,000 ballots in this year’s general election could be discarded due to incorrect or missing envelope dates—potentially influencing the outcome of the presidential race. With Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral votes making it the largest prize among the seven swing states, this issue carries significant weight, the outlet added.

Trending Around the Web