Advertisement

‘DEI DEBATE’: Gutfeld Torches ABC, Kamala Over Biased Debate Format

Advertisement

OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.


Fox News presenter Greg Gutfeld referred to the presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump as a “DEI debate” after moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis’ blatant prejudice and their one-sided “fact-checking.”

On Wednesday, Gutfeld responded to the one-sided debate performance during the latest installment of “The Five.”

“Well, I don’t know who won but I know who lost it was the American people You know, you could say if you complain about the refs you’re losing Well, if the refs are corrupt, you’ve got a complaint because everybody lost,” Gutfeld said. “I felt like my brain was being waterboarded by the sheer nonsense of these idiot moderators.”

Although the moderators exhibited bias against Trump in previous debates, Gutfeld observed that the debate’s structure diverted attention from them in the days preceding the event.

“I honestly don’t know how anyone can decide who won the debate. That’s like trying to guess the price of a painting that you suspect is a forgery. You can’t objectively decide a winner in a sham competition. This is truly the first DEI debate where one candidate was subjected to a high standard and the other was held to no standards at all,” he continued.

“They removed the essence of fairness to achieve an outcome that could not be scored. You cannot score that. That is why you can’t say who won or who lost. A liberal should be ashamed that your candidate needed the odds to be stocked so heavily in their favor.”

Advertisement

WATCH:

The mainstream media largely praised Vice President Kamala Harris for her performance in the debate on Tuesday night, but the battle to win over undecided voters might not be over yet.

Several American viewers of the televised debate told Reuters that they are still not convinced that the Democrat is the better candidate.

The publication invited ten respondents who claimed they were still unsure about the November 5th election to watch the ninety-minute debate and then provide their feedback. Six voters declared they would definitely or most likely vote for Trump, compared to three who supported Harris and one who was unsure, in a startling reversal of what may be expected.

Many more stated that before they would contemplate voting for Harris, she must be significantly more serious about covering the costs of her expensive priorities.

With regard to addressing the exorbitant costs of housing and household goods, five respondents characterized the veep as “vague.”

“I still don’t know what she is for,” said Mark Kadish, 61, an entrepreneur in Florida. “There was no real meat and bones for her plans.” Robert Wheeler, 48, a security firm executive in Nevada who was previously leaning toward Harris, said her posturing and platitudes left him feeling more committed to voting for Trump who he said has actually proposed tangible policies to back up his promises. “I felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump instead of why she’s the right candidate,” Wheeler said.

Advertisement

The focus group, consisting of four women and six men, with eight White and two Black participants, is representative of varied segments of the undecided voter population in battleground states, despite the small sample size.

In addition, red flags were raised on Wednesday morning when more indecisive voters started telling reporters they weren’t that impressed with the vice president, despite claims from commentators and mainstream media that Harris had won the debate handily.

Except for a few remarks regarding the tax advantages for small enterprises and working families, Harris mainly sidestepped the chance to address specific questions.

She might regret using that tactic given that the campaign was exposed a few days prior for stealing whole policy sections from President Joe Biden’s website. Her website no longer lists her previous opinions, which included funding gender change surgery for convicts and immigrants and decriminalizing all hard drugs.

Trending Around the Web Now