Advertisement

Supreme Court: ‘Thousands’ Of Inmates Denied Chance At Shorter Sentences

Advertisement

OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.


On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against a drug dealer. This meant that thousands of federal prisoners who were trying to get their sentences cut would have to wait longer.

NBC News reported that the court, which had a rare ideological split of 6-3, said Mark Pulsifer, who admitted to selling methamphetamines in 2020, could not use a part of the First Step Act, which is a major law that changes how sentences are given.

The question at hand was whether Pulsifer should have to serve 15 years in prison or be able to get a “safety valve” provision. It says that nonviolent, low-level drug offenders could get a lighter sentence under certain circumstances, according to the news source.

In a decision by liberal Justice Elena Kagan, the court said that Pulsifer did not meet the requirements. Five of the six conservative justices on the court agreed with her and voted for her.

The part in question lays out a set of rules for giving sentences that are shorter than the minimums that are required by law. The court said Pulsifer had to meet all the requirements and didn’t agree with his argument that meeting some criteria would be enough to get relief. The decision was partly based on how the court understood the word “and,” the news source said.

Kagan wrote that Congress “did not give safety-valve relief to all defendants, but only to some.” Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, the two liberal justices who were still on the bench, joined Neil Gorsuch, the conservative justice, in disagreeing.

Advertisement

Gorsuch said that the high court put a lot of limits on the First Step Act’s goal.

“Adopting the government’s preferred interpretation guarantees that thousands more people in the federal justice system will be denied a chance — just a chance — at an individualized sentence. For them, the First Step Act offers no hope.”

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court dealt another blow to Gov. Greg Abbott’s efforts to secure his state’s border with Mexico after years of dealing with migrant surges thanks to President Joe Biden’s lack of enforcement.

Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees the 5th Circuit district, further delayed Texas’ implementation of its immigrant deportation laws related to Senate Bill 4, Newsweek reported. The deadline is now extended until 5 p.m. on March 18th.

The new law was set to go into effect later this month and would allow for the arrest of people who are illegally in the state and country.

Earlier, “Alito issued the administrative hold, which will block the law from taking effect until March 13. That temporary pause will give the court additional time to review the case but does not necessarily signal which way the court is leaning,” CNN reported at the time.

Advertisement

The order came after several pro-mass immigration groups and the Biden administration filed an emergency application with the nation’s highest court after an appeals court gave Texas the green light to begin enforcing its law.

CNN added: “Senate Bill 4, signed into law by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in December, immediately raised concerns among immigration advocates about increased racial profiling as well as detentions and attempted deportations by state authorities in Texas, where Latinos represent 40% of the population. Last week, a federal judge in Austin, Texas, blocked the state government from implementing the law.”

“If allowed to proceed, SB 4 could open the door to each state passing its version of immigration laws,” Judge David Alan Ezra wrote in his ruling that the federal appeals court eventually overturned.

The case comes after Biden visited Brownsville, Texas, ostensibly to address the chaotic border Republicans say he created when he revoked nearly all of former President Donald Trump’s strict enforcement policies on his first day in office.

Test your skills with this Quiz!

The union representing the U.S. Border Patrol chided and mocked Biden after he visited a sector in Texas last week that does not get a lot of illegal migrant activity.

Biden’s visit drew the ire of the nation’s premier border protection service as the union appeared to characterize the trip as window dressing in an election year as illegal immigration shoots to the top of the list of concerns among a majority of Americans.

“Board AF1, take nap. Wake up in place called Brownsville,” the group wrote on the X platform in a joking about Biden’s itinerary. “Read large teleprompter message, ‘It’s all Trump’s fault.’ Board AF1, ask who people in green uniforms were, told they ‘strap’ illegal aliens, express horror, take nap. Wake up, call a lid, hit beach, take nap.”

Advertisement